This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of utilise.

KindleFire1

This week's tablet and smartphone news has been largely dominated past Apple tree and iOS 9, only Amazon is bidding off-white to change that with a new, ultra-low-cost Fire tablet. The due east-commerce giant was arguably the first manufacturer to successfully challenge Apple in the tablet market with its 2011 Kindle Burn down, and it's continued to push button device costs downwardly without compromising performance. Today, with the Fire Tablet, Amazon is pushing its toll points well into two-digit territory.

Whether or not that'southward a good deal, of course, depends on your hardware needs. Amazon's basic comparison chart is below:

FireComparison

Sources signal that the SoC within the Fire is a MediaTek MT8127. That's a quad-core, Cortex-A7 CPU clocked at i.3GHz with an ARM Mali-450 MP4 GPU, 1GB of RAM, hardware back up for H.265 playback, and 1080p H.264 support baked-in as well. The screen resolution should be serviceable, given the device's small size, but information technology'south not going to clock in as Retina-class. If you're hoping for an ultra-inexpensive mobile gaming platform, we'd recommend looking to a different tablet — the Mali-450 MP4 has been on the market for several years at this signal and will exist thoroughly outclassed past any modernistic SoC.

NewFire

'dem bezels.

Then again, this tablet costs $fifty. it was just five years ago that a $99 Maylong tablet of roughly this size got the tech earth buzzing — correct up until people actually tried information technology. When Amazon introduced the original Kindle Burn in 2011, it was hailed as a groundbreaking "cheap" tablet, despite debuting at $199. The CPU and GPU specs on the new Fire are stronger than either the debut Kindle Burn or the 2012 refresh, its cameras are better, and it weighs less. Toss in the fact that information technology's also 1/4 the price of its ancestor, and you've got a strong combination for the correct kind of buyer. The company claims upward to seven hours of bombardment life, reviews will probable come in a scrap under that marking. Expandable storage is available via microSD slot.

Plugging you into the Amazon economy

Amazon is so certain that you lot'll love the $50 Fire, it's offer to sell them in six-packs of $250. That works out to $41 per device or, if y'all prefer the sales pitch, "Buy five tablets and get the sixth 1 gratuitous." Nobody else is crazy plenty to attempt a stunt similar that — though to exist fair, nobody else sells a tablet people might plausibly want to own for $50, either. The indicate of Amazon selling an ultra-low-toll tablet is to hook you on all the things yous can impulse-buy with a $fifty Amazon tablet. It's the razors-and-shaving blades model for the mod era, except instead of selling you lot razors at roughly half the price of gold, Amazon will sell you Goggle box shows, movies, ebooks, and other goods, both real-globe and digital, for various amounts of money.

Dissimilar Apple, which earns billions of dollars on hardware sales, Amazon has no great interest in making money off Fire itself. Fire, Fire HD, and Burn HDX, are all designed to encourage customers to buy Amazon Prime subscriptions. According to the visitor, Amazon Prime number customers spend nearly 2x more than at Amazon than non-Prime customers. Research by Consumer Intelligence Review Partners, conducted early in 2015, showed that Prime number customers bought an boilerplate of $1500 per year, compared to non-Prime customers, who spent $627.

From Amazon'southward perspective, putting a $fifty tablet in as many hands as possible makes a great deal of sense. If that tablet drives $51 in additional sales throughout the yr, whether for content or physical goods, then it'll be a net revenue gain for the visitor. Granted, Amazon won't brand a net profit if a $l device but generates $51 in sales — just Amazon has never been nearly turning a profit in the first place.

The Burn down Phone wasn't discussed at all in today'south announcements, implying that the project is well and truly dead.